Much Ado About a Tax Reform: Aviation Professionals Warn of Looming Crisis in Nigeria’s Skies

As Nigeria races toward implementing its much-anticipated tax reform law next year, turbulence is already building across the nation’s aviation sector. Far from being a welcomed fiscal innovation, the policy is drawing fierce criticism from key stakeholders who say the new regime could reverse critical gains in safety, infrastructure, and operational efficiency.

At the forefront of this alarm is the Association of Nigeria Aviation Professionals (ANAP). In an emotionally charged interaction with aviation correspondents at the national secretariat within the Lagos airport complex, Comrade AbdulRasaq Saidu, the union’s Secretary General, issued a blistering critique of the proposed tax structure.

“This tax reform is not reform for us—it’s regression. If implemented, it will take aviation back to the tragic days of 2005 and 2006, when multiple aircraft accidents shook the entire country,” Saidu warned, drawing a vivid comparison between that dark chapter in Nigerian aviation and the potential fallout of the new tax law.

The crux of the controversy lies in the provision that mandates all revenue generated by aviation agencies be remitted directly to the central government. Under this model, agencies would be dependent on federal allocations instead of managing their earnings—a move Saidu describes as “suicidal” for a sector that runs on immediate, round-the-clock financing.

“Aviation is not just another ministry or parastatal—it is a living, breathing system where delays in maintenance or procurement could mean the difference between life and death,” he said. “We already have agencies struggling to pay salaries, maintain radar systems, calibrate navigation aids, and ensure airside safety. Starving them further will be catastrophic.”

Indeed, the aviation sector in Nigeria is no stranger to fiscal bottlenecks. But the fear now is that a centralized tax regime will create a new layer of bureaucratic inertia that delays essential spending on safety-critical functions. According to Saidu, when revenue no longer flows directly to the agencies that generate them, decisions affecting safety will require longer approval times—time the industry cannot afford.

Beyond infrastructure and safety, there is also the human angle to consider. Thousands of workers across airports, control towers, and maintenance hangars worry that delayed salary payments and shrinking operational budgets will erode morale and professionalism in a sector where precision is paramount.

“I fear for our people,” Saidu said. “Not just the engineers and controllers, but the travelers, the cabin crew, and their families. The ripple effect of this reform is far bigger than numbers in a spreadsheet.”

He also criticized what he called poor consultation with industry stakeholders, insisting that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu may have been “badly advised” on including aviation under the new tax policy. “The aviation sector should have been exempted. It is governed by global standards—ICAO, IATA—and any reform must be tailored to meet those requirements.”

Saidu’s message is as much a plea as it is a protest. He disclosed that aviation unions are currently mobilizing for an emergency summit to deliberate on the next course of action, hinting at a possible confrontation if government fails to reconsider.

At its heart, this dispute is more than a technical budget matter—it is a collision between fiscal reform and operational reality. Aviation, unlike other sectors, does not forgive lapses. A cracked runway, an uncalibrated navigation system, a delayed emergency upgrade—all are potential death traps if not swiftly handled.

While the federal government touts the reform as a way to enhance transparency and efficiency in revenue collection, many aviation experts fear it is a one-size-fits-all model applied to a sector that requires surgical precision and autonomous funding.

The real danger, they argue, is not merely institutional inconvenience—but a return to tragic headlines of “another crash,” and “another investigation.” This is the risk when reforms ignore sector-specific nuances in pursuit of broader economic objectives.

Much ado about a tax reform? Maybe. But when the cost of poor policy implementation is measured in human lives, every concern becomes a critical warning. Aviation is not a sector to be toyed with. It is a safety-sensitive industry that demands foresight, not fiscal shortcuts. For the sake of all who fly and all who serve the skies, this is one reform that must be carefully reconsidered.

@2025 The Ameh News: All Rights Reserved.