The air in Nigeria’s insurance sector is thick with tension as the Nigerian Insurers Association (NIA) takes a bold legal step against what it perceives as an overreach by lawmakers. On Tuesday, the Association confirmed that it has filed a suit in court, seeking clarity on the constitutional powers of the House of Representatives Committee on Capital Market and Institutions, which recently launched a probe into 25 insurance companies.
The Committee’s investigation, which began earlier this week, centers on allegations of non-remittance of multi-billion-naira revenues owed to the Federal Government. It also touches on critical issues such as claims settlement, financial disclosures, policy issuance, and premium payments—areas that directly affect the lives of ordinary policyholders across the country.
For many Nigerians, especially those who rely on insurance to cushion life’s unexpected blows—like a family in Lagos recently denied claims after a flood destroyed their home—this development is more than just a power tussle in Abuja. It speaks to larger questions about trust, transparency, and accountability in an industry often misunderstood by the public.
“We’re not running from oversight,” said Mrs. Bola Odukale, the Director-General of the NIA. “Our members acted based on legal counsel. The issue at stake is whether lawmakers can override the statutory duties of regulatory bodies like NAICOM or the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
The Association’s stance is that matters involving financial disclosures and regulatory compliance fall under the purview of designated agencies—not legislative committees. Odukale stressed that the move to approach the courts is not an act of defiance, but a call for clarity to ensure institutions function within their constitutional boundaries.
A Clash of Oversight?
Legal and governance experts are weighing in.
Dr. Michael Ogunleye, a constitutional law lecturer at the University of Ibadan, believes the case could define institutional roles going forward.
“This is a necessary tension,” he said. “While the legislature has oversight powers, it must not usurp the work of established regulators. If the court agrees with the NIA, it may restrict future probes into sectors that already have statutory watchdogs.”
Financial analyst, Morenike Adebayo, warned that constant friction between regulatory bodies and the legislature could shake investor confidence.
“It creates confusion. Foreign and local investors want predictability and a sense that businesses won’t be dragged into multiple oversight regimes,” she said.
The Hul Cost
Beyond the legal arguments, ordinary Nigerians, policyholders, small business owners, and workers,bremain anxious. If insurers are embroiled in prolonged legal battles, claims processing and premium refunds may stall, affecting people like Chika Okoro, a small-scale trader in Enugu whose business insurance claim is still pending.
“I just want to know if they’ll pay me,” she said, holding back frustration. “This case shouldn’t affect those of us struggling to get what we are owed.”
What’s Next?
The case is expected to be heard in the coming weeks, with far-reaching implications not just for the insurance sector but for how institutions interpret the Nigerian Constitution’s separation of powers.
Until then, the industry waits—caught between a duty to comply with oversight and a right to defend itself from what it sees as undue interference.
@2025 The Ameh News: All Rights Reserved
Discover more from Ameh News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
